Challenging Stereotypes

Here’s a little experiment.  Imagine someone in each of the following categories: teenager, single mother, gay man, banker, Muslim, conservative Republican, union member, liberal Democrat, Christian.  Were you able to conjure up a mental image of each stereotypical character?  Whether we admit it or not, we all employ stereotypes constructed by our own experiences and helped along by the culture and its media.  Once rooted in our thinking, stereotypes are extremely difficult to change or remove.  All of our perceptions will be filtered through our stereotypes.

Two recent examples

While listening to a talk radio program the other day I heard a gentleman call in with a comment something like this, “Democrats are for the middle class and Republicans are for the rich.”  Those stereotypes are firmly etched in our national political consciousness.  Are they accurate?  Doesn’t matter.  For some people the perception is the reality.

Willow Creek Community Church is holding its annual Leadership Summit this week.  This is a big event featuring high-profile speakers. The CEO of Starbucks was scheduled to speak, but Willow released him from his contract at the last minute because he was under pressure from the gay community.  Willow Creek is a Christian church and therefore assumed to be anti-gay.  Is that accurate?  Doesn’t matter.  For some people the perception is the reality.

Both of the above example illustrate how stereotypes can be used in public discourse to obscure facts, to over simplify complexities and to spawn hostility between groups of people.   This is not helpful in our already polarized political and cultural environment.

How to challenge stereotypes

If stereotypes arise from efforts to predict behavior and to remove uncertainty, then perhaps it follows that to break down stereotypes we must challenge predictabilty and confuse presumed certainty.  High predictability results in low information and with low predictability come high information.  So let’s be a little less predictable.

This helpful idea comes from Tim Muehlhoff and Todd V. Lewis in their book Authentic Communication.  They point to “Jesus Christ (as) the greatest example of the ‘low predictability, high information’ principle at work” (p. 86).  Jesus defied all stereotypes and upset the expectations of just about everyone.  He was not the military Messiah that the Jews anticipated, nor was he the political revolutionary that the Romans feared.  He befriended those of low social worth and pretty much ignored the trappings of power, status and wealth.  His parables consistently challenged the stereotypes of the day.  For example, the “expert in the law” to whom Jesus told the famous parable of the Good Samaritan probably viewed Samaritans with contempt as was common among the Jews of Jesus’ day.  And Jesus made a Samaritan the hero.  To get an idea of what that must have sounded like to Jesus’ audience, imagine telling an authoritative story at a Democratic party convention in which Sarah Palin is the hero.  It wouldn’t go over well.

Bill Hybels, pastor of Willow Creek, demonstrated some “low predictability, high information” behavior in his response to the Starbucks incident.  In addition to releasing Schultz from his speaking obligation, Hybels wants him to know that he’s welcome at Willow.  Then he encouraged those in the audience to stop by a Starbucks to show there are no hard feelings.

Do you think that today’s public discourse is polarized by too much stereotyping?  Have you ever had your stereotypes challenged by “low predictability, high information” behavior?

Advertisements
Gallery | This entry was posted in Communication, Culture, Current Events, Perspectives and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Challenging Stereotypes

  1. Pingback: Reaction to the Hobby Lobby Decision: Two Truths and a Lie | Connecting Dots…to God

  2. Pingback: Shock Value: A Communications Tip from Jesus | Connecting Dots…to God

  3. marneymcnall says:

    Sadly, I think we don’t even realize how much we stereotype. Myself included. It’s easier. It’s instant. It takes conscious effort not to do it….to really look at the person and realize they don’t fit into a nice, reductionist box. As a writer, yourself, Judy, I’m sure you know how hard we work to not create stock and cliched characters. We try to give them a mix of traits and likes and dislikes that might clash and pull in different directions. Ironically, we do this to make them more ‘real’. Whereas, every day, we turn real people into cliches. Writing characters is a good exercise to learn not to stereotype, I think. Great post.

    • Judy says:

      I agree completely. It’s all to easy to arrange people into convenient categories, and as much as I dislike being categorized, I realize that I do it too. Thanks for your comment!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s